(HC)Perlaza

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUBEN DARIO PERLAZA, Case No. 1:24-cv-0693 JLT EPG (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER’S

UNTIMELY OBJECTIONS

13 v. (Doc. 29) 14 WARDEN, F.C.I. MENDOTA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 On December 2, 2024, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations, 18 recommending the Court grant Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 26.) The Court 19 served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner and notified him that any objections 20 were due within 30 days. (Id. at 6.) The Court also advised Petitioner the failure to file timely 21 objections may result in the wavier of rights. (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 22 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) 23 On January 16, 2025, the Court performed a de novo review of the matter, dismissed the 24 petition, and entered judgment. (Docs. 27, 28.) After the Court entered judgment—46 days after 25 the date of service of the Findings and Recommendations—the Court received objections signed 26 and dated January 13,…