(HC)Perlaza
(HC)Perlaza v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN DARIO PERLAZA, Case No. 1:24-cv-0693 JLT EPG (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER’S
UNTIMELY OBJECTIONS
v. (Doc. 29) WARDEN, F.C.I. MENDOTA, Respondent. 16 On December 2, 2024, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations, recommending the Court grant Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition. (Doc. 26.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner and notified him that any objections were due within 30 days. (Id. at 6.) The Court also advised Petitioner the failure to file timely objections may result in the wavier of rights. (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) On January 16, 2025, the Court performed a de novo review of the matter, dismissed the petition, and entered judgment. (Docs. 27, 28.) After the Court entered judgment—46 days after the date of service of the Findings and Recommendations—the Court received objections signed and dated January 13,…