Ruben Hernandez v. Terminix International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20252:25-cv-00042California1,447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 || RUBEN HERNANDEZ, ) Case No. CV 25-0042 FMO (ASx) Plaintiff, V. ORDER REMANDING ACTION TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, INC., et a Defendants. ) ) On October 4, 2024, Ruben Hernandez (“plaintiff’) filed a Complaint in the Los Angeles 18 || County Superior Court against defendants Terminix International, Inc., The Terminix International Company Limited Partnership, The ServiceMaster Company, LLC, (collectively, “corporate 20 || defendants”), and Michael Johnson (“Johnson”) (collectively, “defendants”) asserting state law claims relating to his employment. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at {J 1 & 6); (Dkt. 1-1, 22 || Complaint at J] 27-86). On January 2, 2025, the corporate defendants removed that action on 23 || diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446. (See Dkt. 1, NOR at 1).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.