Caasi

(PC) Tillett v. Caasi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20251:24-cv-00849California1,139 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 LLOYD R. TILLETT, Case No. 1:24-cv-00849-KES-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, 11 DISCOVERY ORDER REQUIRING v. PARTIES TO EXCHANGE 12 DOCUMENTS

DANIEL JAMES CAASI,

13 Defendant. 14

15 To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,1 the Court will 16 direct that certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced.2 17 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 18 1. Each party has sixty days from the date of service of this order to serve opposing 19 parties, or their counsel, if represented, with copies of the following documents 20 and/or evidence if they have them in their possession, custody, or control, to the 21

22 1 See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 526 F.3d 499, 508–09 (9th Cir. 2008) (“We begin with 23 the principle that the district court is charged with effectuating the speedy and orderly administration of justice. There is universal acceptance in the federal courts that, in carrying out this mandate, a district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.