Michelle Torres v. Wireless Vision, LLC

1 2 3 4 5 6

JS-6

7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11) MICHELLE TORRES, ) Case No. CV 25-0398 FMO (AGRx) 12 Plaintiff, 13 V. ORDER REMANDING ACTION 14|| WIRELESS VISION, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On November 6, 2024, Michelle Torres (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against defendants Wireless Vision, LLC and Wireless Vision Holdings, LLC (“defendants”), asserting state law claims relating to her employment. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of 20 | Removal (“NOR”) at J 1); (id., Exh. 1, Complaint). On January 15, 2025, defendants removed the action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441(b). (See Dkt. 1, 22 || NOR at 96). Having reviewed the pleadings, the court hereby remands this action to state court 23 || for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). 24 In general, “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original…