Valenzuela

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMANTHA XOCHILT VALENZUELA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01061 JLT CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART,

13 v. DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

14 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., (Doc. 8) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Samatha Xochilt Valenzuela initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on 18 September 5, 2024 (Doc. 1), and the Court issued summons for the defendants the following day. 19 (Docs. 4, 5.) On November 11, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why sanctions 20 should not be imposed for her failure to prosecute this action and serve the summonses and 21 complaint on Defendants in a timely manner. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the order. 22 On December 6, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge observed that “90 days have passed 23 since Plaintiff’s filing of the complaint,” as required by the service deadline under Rule 4(m) of 24 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 8 at 2.) In…