Valenzuela

Valenzuela v. United States Postal Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20251:24-cv-01061California894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMANTHA XOCHILT VALENZUELA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01061 JLT CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART,

v. DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., (Doc. 8) Defendants. 16 Samatha Xochilt Valenzuela initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on September 5, 2024 (Doc. 1), and the Court issued summons for the defendants the following day. (Docs. 4, 5.) On November 11, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for her failure to prosecute this action and serve the summonses and complaint on Defendants in a timely manner. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff failed to respond to the order. On December 6, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge observed that “90 days have passed since Plaintiff’s filing of the complaint,” as required by the service deadline under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 8 at 2.) In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.