Kimberly Frazier v. Robert's Income Tax Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20252:25-cv-00522California919 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:25-cv-00522-MEMF-RAO 11 KIMBERLY FRAZIER,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

13 v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

14 STATE LAW CLAIMS

ROBERT’S INCOME TAX CORPORATION;

15 ALMA AVENUE, LLC; and DOES 1 to 10,

16 Defendants.

17

18

19

20 On January 21, 2025, Frazier filed a Complaint against Robert’s Income Tax Corporation;

21 Alma Avenue, LLC; and Does 1–10 , asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an 22 alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a 23 claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 24 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. 25 Code §§ 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief based on California Health and 26 Safety Code §19955,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.