Latanya Williams v. Catcafe Lounge

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20252:25-cv-00658California926 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:25-cv-00658-MEMF-MAR 11 LATANYA WILLIAMS,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

13 v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

14 STATE LAW CLAIMS

CATCAFE LOUNGE; ENZO

15 RICCIARDELLI, AS TRUSTEE OF THE

16 LIFETIME BENEFIT TRUST FOR RAFFAELE RICCIARDELLI; and DOES 1 to 17 10,

18 Defendants.

19

20

21 On January 24, 2025, Plaintiff Latanya Williams filed a Complaint against Defendants 22 Catcafe Lounge and Enzo Ricciardelli, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an 23 alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a 24 claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 25 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. 26 Code §§ 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.