Latanya Williams v. Catcafe Lounge
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 Case No.: 2:25-cv-00658-MEMF-MAR 11 LATANYA WILLIAMS,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO
13 v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL
JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S
14 STATE LAW CLAIMS
CATCAFE LOUNGE; ENZO
15 RICCIARDELLI, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
16 LIFETIME BENEFIT TRUST FOR RAFFAELE RICCIARDELLI; and DOES 1 to 17 10,
18 Defendants.
19
20
21 On January 24, 2025, Plaintiff Latanya Williams filed a Complaint against Defendants 22 Catcafe Lounge and Enzo Ricciardelli, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an 23 alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a 24 claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 25 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. 26 Code §§ 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive…