Latanya Williams v. Catcafe Lounge

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 20252:25-cv-00658California926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:25-cv-00658-MEMF-MAR LATANYA WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS

CATCAFE LOUNGE; ENZO

RICCIARDELLI, AS TRUSTEE OF THE

LIFETIME BENEFIT TRUST FOR RAFFAELE RICCIARDELLI; and DOES 1 to 10,

Defendants.

On January 24, 2025, Plaintiff Latanya Williams filed a Complaint against Defendants Catcafe Lounge and Enzo Ricciardelli, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.