Marsh

Marsh v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20251:24-cv-01304California665 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TERRANCE MARSH, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-01304-CDB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

13 v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH

14 FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, THE LOCAL RULES

15 Defendant. (Doc. 17)

16 14-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Relevant Background 19 On March 28, 2024, Plaintiffs Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding 20 pro se, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint in the Superior Court for the State of 21 California, County of Kern in the action titled Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh vs. Freedom 22 Mortgage, Case No. BCV24101027 (“state court action”). (Doc. 1). Defendant Freedom 23 Mortgage Corporation (“Defendant”) removed the action to this Court on October 24, 2024. (Id.). 24 On December 9, 2024, Plaintiffs filed the first amended complaint. (Doc. 13). On January 8, 25 2025, Defendant filed the pending…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.