Marsh

Marsh v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20251:24-cv-01304California665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE MARSH, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-01304-CDB

Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH

FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, THE LOCAL RULES

Defendant. (Doc. 17)

14-DAY DEADLINE 17 Relevant Background On March 28, 2024, Plaintiffs Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Kern in the action titled Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh vs. Freedom Mortgage, Case No. BCV24101027 (“state court action”). (Doc. 1). Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation (“Defendant”) removed the action to this Court on October 24, 2024. (Id.). On December 9, 2024, Plaintiffs filed the first amended complaint. (Doc. 13). On January 8, 2025, Defendant filed the pending…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.