Hallenberg
Hallenberg v. Walker
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HEIDI HALLENBERG and BRANDON Case No. 1:24-cv-01486-JLT-BAM
WALKER,
12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR RELIEF FROM LATE FILING DUE TO 13 EXCUSABLE NEGLECT v. 14 (Doc. 8) DARRICK WALKER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Currently before the Court Plaintiffs Heidi Hallenberg and Brandon Walker’s Motion for 18 Relief from late Filing Due to Excusable Neglect. (Doc. 8.) 19 On January 6, 2025, Defendant Darrick Walker filed a Motion to Transfer under 28 20 U.S.C. § 1404(a). (Doc. 5.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Plaintiffs’ opposition was due no 21 later than January 21, 2025. L.R. 230(c). 22 On January 23, 2025, Plaintiffs filed the instant motion seeking relief from the late filing 23 of their opposition due to excusable neglect. (Doc. 8 at 1-2.) In explaining the delay, Plaintiffs 24 state that, due to a calendaring mistake, the deadline was inadvertently miscalculated. (Id. at 2.) 25 …