Nangalama

(PC) Coston v. Nangalama

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20252:10-cv-02009California4,789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL MURPHY COSTON, No. 2:10-cv-02009-MCE-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. CERTIFICATION OF FACTS AND ORDER

TO SHOW CAUSE

ANDREW NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter was before the court for hearing on December 18, 2024, on plaintiff’s motion for an order so show cause why California State Prison-Sacramento (CSP-Sac) should not be ordered to pay plaintiff’s attorney’s fees and costs incurred due to CSP-Sac’s violation of court orders. See ECF No. 308. Attorneys Eric Wolff and Julie Shepard appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. California Deputy Attorney General Jon Allin appeared on behalf of CSP-Sac. For the reasons stated by the court at the hearing and as set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly, the court certifies the facts below, finding that a prima facie case has been established that CSP-Sac has violated a court order. Thus, for the reasons set forth below, CSP-Sac is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.