Ramirez
Ramirez v. Pfeiffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NARCISO RAMIREZ,
Case No. 24-cv-01714 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; DENYING CLASS ACTION STATUS C. PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants. (Docket No. 55)
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officers at Salinas Valley State Prison for excessive force. The third amended complaint (“TAC”) is the operative complaint. Dkt. No. 46. The Court found the TAC stated a cognizable claim and ordered service on Defendants Hernandez, Saeturn, Alvarez, and Sivongsa. Dkt. No. 50. On January 21, 2025, Defendants Sivongsa and Alvarez appeared. Dkt. No. 54. Their response to the Court’s Order of Service is currently due by February 11, 2025. See Dkt. No. 50 at 5. As for the other two defendants, the CDCR filed notice that…