Saige
Saige v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 3, 202524-4072California1,016 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 3 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-4072
IN RE JACOB SAIGE; REGINALD D.C. No. 5:24-cv-00195-RGK-SHK
MCOWENS.
______________________________
MEMORANDUM*
JACOB SAIGE; REGINALD MCOWENS,
Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent,
CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC.,
Real Party in Interest.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Argued and Submitted November 6, 2024 Pasadena, California Before: W. FLETCHER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and MÁRQUEZ, District Judge.**
Jacob Saige and Reginald McOwens petition for a writ of mandamus
vacating the district court’s order granting Defendant and Real Party in Interest
Capstone Logistics, LLC’s (“Capstone”) motion to compel arbitration and dismiss
complaint. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 and grant mandamus
relief.
To determine whether to grant a writ of mandamus, we weigh the factors
articulated in Bauman v. U.S. District Court, 557 F.2d 650, 654–55 (9th Cir. 1977).
The five factors include:
(1) The party seeking the writ has no other…