Go

Go v. McClaugherty CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 2025D083772California7,516 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 1/31/25 Go v. McClaugherty CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JUANITO APAO GO, D083772

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. CVPS2203302)

JAY McCLAUGHERTY et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside, Christopher B. Harmon, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Ellis Law Group and Mark E. Ellis for Plaintiff and Appellant. Ropers Majeski, and Lawrence Borys, Pascale Gagnon, Anna Norvruzyan for Defendants and Respondents. Plaintiff and appellant Juanito Apao Go appeals a judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of defendants and respondents, attorney Jay McClaugherty and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.