In re Brody N. CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Brody N.’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a Wende brief indicating that counsel has not been able to identify any arguable issues for reversal and asking the court to independently review the record for error. Counsel identified two potential issues to assist us in our review: (1) whether the juvenile court erred by admitting gang evidence, notwithstanding the lack of any charged gang offenses or enhancements; and (2) whether the juvenile court abused its discretion by committing Brody N. to a secure youth treatment facility. We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders, and considered the issues identified by Brody N.’s counsel. We conclude there is no arguable issue that would result in a reversal or modification of the disposition order. Therefore, we affirm. Competent counsel has represented Brody N. on this appeal.

3

DISPOSITION

The order is affirmed.

McCONNELL, P. J.

WE CONCUR:

HUFFMAN, J.

IRION, J.

4