Evans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE EVANS, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00883-BAS-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO AMEND

SCHEDULING ORDER AND

CITY OF SAN DIEGO; CHIEF DAVID

ISSUING SECOND AMENDED

NISLEIT; OFFICER VICTOR

SCHEDULING ORDER

RODRIGUEZ; OFFICER MARK

WILLIAMS; and DOES 1 through 50, [Doc. No. 51] inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (“Joint Motion”). Doc. No. 51. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion and ISSUES a Second Amended Scheduling Order. I. LEGAL STANDARD In determining whether to modify a scheduling order, the Court considers the “good cause” standard set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4). Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). Pursuant to Rule 16(b)(4), a “schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Id. (emphasis added); Zivkovic v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 302 F.3d…