Johnson v. Veritas Investment Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20253:23-cv-05190California735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES ELLIS JOHNSON, Case No. 23-cv-05190-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

VERITAS INVESTMENT INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 20 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion, for the following reasons. Plaintiff filed the FAC on March 28, 2024, after the Court’s dismissal of his original Complaint. See FAC (ECF 19). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, arguing anew that this Court lacks the authority to consider the FAC Complaint because Plaintiff has failed to allege a cause of action created by federal law or that the FAC requires resolution of a substantial question of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.