Sifuentes

Sifuentes v. X Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20253:24-cv-00590California742 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, Case No. 24-cv-00590-SK (JSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW CONSENT TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

X CORP., INC., JURISDICTION Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Plaintiff David Angel Sifuentes, III, proceeding without attorney representation, filed this action against Defendant on January 29, 2024. The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim and Mr. Sifuentes consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 9.) Upon review, Judge Kim ordered the complaint served on Defendant. (Dkt. No. 13.) After Defendant was served with the complaint and summons also consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 28), Judge Kim proceeded to make several rulings. Ultimately, Judge Kim granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend as to all of his claims, except leave to amend was granted as to his claim for intentional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.