Gastelum

Gastelum v. Tilly's, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20251:22-cv-00178California7,181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-00178-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING OCTOBER 30, 2024,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 36) TILLY’S, INC.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

Defendant. (1) GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS AND DECLINE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S STATE

LAW CLAIM, (2) DENY PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, and (3)

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(Docs. 6, 38)

14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 21 On February 11, 2022, Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint against Defendant Tilly’s, Inc.1 (“Defendant”) alleging violations of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. (Doc. 1). These claims stem from alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.