Xiong
Xiong v. Garland
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20251:24-cv-00802California693 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAICHUN XIONG, Case No. 1:24-cv-00802-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING
WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH
MERRICK B. GARLAND, et al., THE LOCAL RULES
Defendants. (Doc. 13)
14-DAY DEADLINE
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING
SET FOR FEBRUARY 19, 2025
18 Relevant Background On July 10, 2024, Plaintiff Kaichun Xiong (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint for writ of mandamus against Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Ur. M. Jaddou (“Defendants”). (Docs. 1, 3). On December 19, 2024, Defendants filed the pending motion to dismiss and served the motion upon Plaintiff. (Doc. 13). On January 14, 2025, Defendants replied in support of the pending motion. (Doc. 15). Plaintiff has failed to…