Xiong

Xiong v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20251:24-cv-00802California693 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAICHUN XIONG, Case No. 1:24-cv-00802-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH

MERRICK B. GARLAND, et al., THE LOCAL RULES

Defendants. (Doc. 13)

14-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING

SET FOR FEBRUARY 19, 2025

18 Relevant Background On July 10, 2024, Plaintiff Kaichun Xiong (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint for writ of mandamus against Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Ur. M. Jaddou (“Defendants”). (Docs. 1, 3). On December 19, 2024, Defendants filed the pending motion to dismiss and served the motion upon Plaintiff. (Doc. 13). On January 14, 2025, Defendants replied in support of the pending motion. (Doc. 15). Plaintiff has failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.