San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20255:20-cv-00824California2,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, Case No. 5:20-cv-00824-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER RE SCOPE OF TRIAL;

GRANTING MOTION TO REOPEN

v. DISCOVERY; DENYING MOTION

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

CITY OF SUNNYVALE, et al., Defendants. Re: ECF Nos. 211, 215, 216, 253, 256

In this case, Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper has sued the Cities of Sunnyvale and Mountain View for violations of the Clean Water Act. The issues here are mostly ready for trial, which is scheduled to begin on June 10, 2025. However, there are still some disputes pending between the parties that must be resolved ahead of trial. The Court addresses them here.1 I. SCOPE OF TRIAL The Court begins by clarifying the scope of trial. Earlier in these proceedings, the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Baykeeper. MSJ Order, ECF No. 139. Ahead of their pretrial conference, though, the parties expressed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.