Young

Young v. Santa Clara County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20255:24-cv-06343California2,481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 HOWARD YOUNG, Case No. 5:24-cv-06343-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS, AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

SANTA CLARA COUNTY, et al., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. [Re: ECF Nos. 9, 14]

14 Before the Court are Defendants County of Santa Clara and Jess B. Guy’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 14 (“MTD”), and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 9 (“MSJ”). Plaintiff opposed Defendants’ motion, ECF No. 19 (“MTD Opp.”), and Defendants filed a Reply in support of the motion, ECF No. 21 (“MTD Reply”). Defendants opposed Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 18 (“MSJ Opp.”), and Plaintiff filed a Reply in support of his motion, ECF No. 20 (“MSJ Reply”). The Court previously found these motions suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacated the joint hearing set for February 6, 2025. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.