Unit 53, Inc. v. Run Roadlines, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20252:24-cv-01718California1,483 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNIT 53, INC., Case No. 2:24-cv-01718-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING RULE 37 EXPENSES RUN ROADLINES, INC., et al., (ECF Nos. 25, 35, 37, 39) Defendant. 16 On December 17, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff Unit 53, Inc.’s motion to compel Defendants Run Roadlines, Inc., Manpreet Randhawa, and 3515 Hwy 99, LLC to make their initial disclosures and to respond to Plaintiff’s interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission.1 12/17/2024 Minute Order (ECF No. 31); 12/20/2024 Order (ECF No. 35). Because Plaintiff had not provided the Court with sufficient information to determine the amount of expenses in making the motion to which it was entitled pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5), the Court ordered Plaintiff to file and submit its reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees. 12/20/2024 Order at 14. Plaintiff has now done so. Pl. Expenses (ECF No. 37.) Defendants were provided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.