Faison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERNITA FAISON, Case No. 2:24-cv-01024-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED B y STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 38.) WALMART, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 38), and

finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The

Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification.

The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain

jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R.

141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for

disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus,…