Cheteni

Cheteni v. Vella

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20253:23-cv-06286California719 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FREEDOM CHETENI, Case No. 23-cv-06286-SI

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. RENEWED MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

MALIA VELLA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 67 Defendants.

12 On January 7, 2025, the Court denied pro se plaintiff Freedom Cheteni’s request for a temporary restraining order and mandatory injunction. Dkt. No. 58. The Court determined that plaintiff had not made the requisite showing of a likelihood of success on the merits of his case. Id. at 13. On January 31, 2025, the Court held an initial case management conference during which the Court set a hearing schedule for defendants’ upcoming motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 66. On February 3, 2025, plaintiff filed a renewed motion for a temporary restraining order. Dkt. No. 67. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that plaintiff’s motion is suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.