McComas
(PC) Drake v. McComas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAM DRAKE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01149-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES
v. (ECF No. 49) MCCOMAS, et al.,
Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Sam Drake (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint on the following claims: (1) violation of the First Amendment based on a facial challenge to Fresno County Jail (“FCJ”) Policy #E-120 and #E-410 against Defendants Mims, McComas, and Zanoni; (2) violation of the First Amendment based on an as-applied challenge to FCJ Policy #E-120 and #E-410 against Defendants Enriquez, Keoniyom, Nichols, and Snyder; and (3) violation of Due Process for returning Plaintiff’s mail against Defendants Enriquez, Keoniyom, Nichols, and Snyder. I. Procedural Background Pursuant to the Court’s June 26, 2024 Amended…