McComas

(PC) Drake v. McComas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20251:22-cv-01149California1,232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAM DRAKE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01149-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES

v. (ECF No. 49) MCCOMAS, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Sam Drake (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint on the following claims: (1) violation of the First Amendment based on a facial challenge to Fresno County Jail (“FCJ”) Policy #E-120 and #E-410 against Defendants Mims, McComas, and Zanoni; (2) violation of the First Amendment based on an as-applied challenge to FCJ Policy #E-120 and #E-410 against Defendants Enriquez, Keoniyom, Nichols, and Snyder; and (3) violation of Due Process for returning Plaintiff’s mail against Defendants Enriquez, Keoniyom, Nichols, and Snyder. I. Procedural Background Pursuant to the Court’s June 26, 2024 Amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.