Zavala
Zavala v. Valdes
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20251:24-cv-01360California806 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANTONIO ZAVALA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01360-JLT-SKO
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO
v. C OO RM DEP RL SY A W NI DT H FA T IH LUE RC EO TU OR T’S PROSECUTE
ROBERT VALDES, (Docs. 4 & 8)
Defendant. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
_____________________________________/
16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the complaint in this action on November 6, 2024. (Docs. 1, 2, & 3.) On November 19, 2024, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Doc. 4.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested an extension of time within which to do so. Instead, on November 25, 2024, Plaintiff filed a “Request for Emergency Protective Order” based on the same allegations made in his complaint. …