Bruce

(PC) Gallegos v. Bruce

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20251:24-cv-01433California2,499 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN ROBERT GALLEGOS, No. 1:24-cv-01433-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS

v. BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF

LIMITATIONS

GLADDEN BRUCE, et al., (ECF No. 1) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on December 19, 2023, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. On November 22, 2024, the action was transferred to the Fresno Division, based on the allegations raised in the first amended complaint. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.