Lazares

Lazares v. Shopify (USA), Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20254:24-cv-07125California2,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MATTHEW LAZARES, Case No. 24-cv-07125-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 12 SHOPIFY (USA), INC., Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Shopify (USA) Inc.’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Dkt. No. 12. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Matthew Lazares initially filed this putative class action in the Superior Court of San Mateo. See Dkt. No. 1 at ¶ 1. In the amended complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant misclassified him and other commissioned sales employees as “exempt,” in violation of California law. See Dkt. No. 1-2 (“FAC”) at ¶¶ 23–34. As a result, Plaintiff asserts that they were not properly paid for overtime or sick time, did not receive proper meal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.