(HC)Aikens

(HC)Aikens v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20251:24-cv-01554California521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DEWAYNE AIKENS, Case No. 1:24-cv-01554-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE AND

v. CLOSE CASE

DOERER, Warden, USP Atwater, (Doc. No. 6) Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner, Daniel Dewayne Aikens (“Petitioner”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this case by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on December 18, 2024. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). On February 3, 2025, Petitioner filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss his Petition. (Doc. No. 6). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may be applied to habeas proceedings to the extent such rules are not inconsistent with the statutory provisions of the Habeas Rules. Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court, Rule 12. See also, Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(a)(4). Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “the 27 1 This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.