Krysti Sederholm v. County of Orange
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20258:24-cv-01790California2,346 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KRYSTI SEDERHOLM, individually ) Case No.: 8:24-cv-01790-CV-DFM and as successor in interest to ROBERT )
ANTHONY MORENO, ) ORDER FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
) REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
16 Plaintiff, ) ) [Stipulation for Protective Order filed vs. ) concurrently herewith] )
COUNTY OF ORANGE, an entity, ) 19 And DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) Mater For Determination Before The ) Honorable Magistrate Judge Douglas 21 Defendants. ) F. McCormick ________________________________ ) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER The Court, having considered the Parties’ Stipulation for Protective Order, and GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Stipulation is hereby GRANTED. A Protective Order is hereby issued as follows: 1. Confidential Material: The Protective Order shall apply to materials designated by either party as confidential due to privilege,…