Krysti Sederholm v. County of Orange

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20258:24-cv-01790California2,346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRYSTI SEDERHOLM, individually ) Case No.: 8:24-cv-01790-CV-DFM and as successor in interest to ROBERT )

ANTHONY MORENO, ) ORDER FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

) REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL

INFORMATION

16 Plaintiff, ) ) [Stipulation for Protective Order filed vs. ) concurrently herewith] )

COUNTY OF ORANGE, an entity, ) 19 And DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ) Mater For Determination Before The ) Honorable Magistrate Judge Douglas 21 Defendants. ) F. McCormick ________________________________ ) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER The Court, having considered the Parties’ Stipulation for Protective Order, and GOOD CAUSE appearing, the Stipulation is hereby GRANTED. A Protective Order is hereby issued as follows: 1. Confidential Material: The Protective Order shall apply to materials designated by either party as confidential due to privilege,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.