Pleshchuk

(PC) Hicks v. Pleshchuk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20252:22-cv-00903California939 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARYL HICKS, Case No. 2:22-cv-0903 TLN CSK P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PLESHCHUK’S MOTION FOR ORDER v. VACATING OUTSTANDING CASE DEADLINES PLESHCHUK, et al., 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Defendant Pleshchuk’s third motion for modification of the discovery and scheduling order is before the Court. As discussed below, defendant Pleshchuk’s motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint against defendants Pleshchuk and Powell, alleging that each defendant was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious mental health needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 25 Though defendant Pleshchuk described this motion as an “ex parte” request, it is not made ex parte as this motion was mailed to plaintiff at his last known address of record. In addition, on January 21, 2025, defendant Powell, who is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.