(PS) Halousek v. CA Public Employees' Retirement System

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20252:23-cv-00839California3,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEILA HALOUSEK, Case No. 2:23-cv-00839-DC-CSK Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT MOTION TO DISMISS

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., (ECF No. 24) 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Shiela Halousek, who is proceeding in forma pauperis, asserts claims in her first amended complaint (“FAC”) against Defendant California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) and the State of California related to her pension payments.1 (ECF No. 23.) Defendant CalPERS moves to dismiss this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 24.) For the reasons that follow, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendant’s motion be GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed with prejudice. / / / / / / / / / 27 This matter proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and Local Rule 302(c)(21). I. BACKGROUND A. Facts2 The FAC refers to Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.