(SS) Rudolph v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20252:23-cv-02765California4,103 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASHLEY E. RUDOLPH, No. 2:23-cv-02765 CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) finding that her disability ended on November 1, 2016 under section 223(f) of the Social Security Act (“Act”). The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 7, 9 & 11. For the reasons discussed below, the court will recommend that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied and the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, born in 1977, applied for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits on January 4, 2012. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 1074, 1166. On November 25, 2013, plaintiff was found disabled for a period beginning on May 28, 2011 and ending November 1, 2016. AT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.