(PC) Harper v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20252:24-cv-01278California1,092 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL HARPER, No. 2:24-cv-1278-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CLAYBURNE WILLIAMS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Daniel Harper, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and requests to proceed in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) reads as follows: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action ... [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Each prior case dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.