Newsom

(PC) Bealer v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20252:24-cv-03089California6,957 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTWOINE BEALER, No. 2:24-cv-3089 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. Plaintiff has paid the court filing fee. The case is before the court for screening of the complaint, and consideration of plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctions and motion for an extension of time to file an amended motion for preliminary injunction. ECF Nos. 1, 2, 8, 9. For the reasons stated below, the court will grant plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint, deny plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, and recommend denial of plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctions. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints A. Legal Standard The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.