Hearns

United States v. Hearns

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202523-2678California931 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

FEB 5 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2678 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:15-cr-00474-PSG-10 v.

MEMORANDUM*

GREGORY HEARNS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Gregory Hearns appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of health

care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.

1. Hearns argues that the district court erred in responding to a jury note

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). by failing to correct the jury’s purported misunderstanding about whether…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.