Hamburg

United States v. Hamburg

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202523-3375California594 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3375 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:22-cr-00140-BLW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHRIS HAMBURG,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 3, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, KOH, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Chris Hamburg appeals his 240-month sentence for two counts of

transporting a minor across state lines to engage in criminal sexual activity in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291, and we affirm.

1. Hamburg argues that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

explain its statutory maximum sentence.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.