Singh
Singh v. McHenry
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202524-912California1,045 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LOVEJEET SINGH; HARPREET No. 24-912 KAUR; S.K., Agency Nos.
A220-735-870
Petitioners, A220-735-871
A220-735-872
v.
JAMES R. McHENRY III, * Acting MEMORANDUM** Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 3, 2025*** San Francisco, California
Before: McKEOWN, FORREST, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Lovejeet Singh, Harpreet Kaur, and their daughter S.K. (collectively
* James R. McHenry III is substituted as Acting Attorney General pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c). ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “Petitioners”) are natives and citizens of India. They seek review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)…