Singh

Singh v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202524-912California1,045 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOVEJEET SINGH; HARPREET No. 24-912 KAUR; S.K., Agency Nos.

A220-735-870

Petitioners, A220-735-871

A220-735-872

v.

JAMES R. McHENRY III, * Acting MEMORANDUM** Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025*** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, FORREST, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Lovejeet Singh, Harpreet Kaur, and their daughter S.K. (collectively

* James R. McHenry III is substituted as Acting Attorney General pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c). ** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “Petitioners”) are natives and citizens of India. They seek review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.