Pelayo-Vidriales

Pelayo-Vidriales v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202524-2083California686 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MANUEL PELAYO-VIDRIALES, No. 24-2083 Agency No. Petitioner, A092-989-456 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Manuel Pelayo-Vidriales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his

appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) determination that Pelayo had been

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). convicted of a particularly serious crime and denial of Pelayo’s applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.