McHenry
Mercado Medina v. McHenry
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202524-1137California787 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROGELIO MERCADO MEDINA; ELIA No. 24-1137 MATA MANCILLA; EMILY MERCADO Agency Nos.
MATA; ELEAZAR MERCADO-MATA, A246-009-365
A208-122-673
Petitioners,
A246-002-654
A246-009-367
v.
JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 3, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona
Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Rogelio Mercado Medina and his wife Elia Mata Mancilla, and their
children Emily Mercado Mata and Eleazar Mercado Mata (collectively,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioners), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of their appeal…