McHenry

Mercado Medina v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202524-1137California787 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROGELIO MERCADO MEDINA; ELIA No. 24-1137 MATA MANCILLA; EMILY MERCADO Agency Nos.

MATA; ELEAZAR MERCADO-MATA, A246-009-365

A208-122-673

Petitioners,

A246-002-654

A246-009-367

v.

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Rogelio Mercado Medina and his wife Elia Mata Mancilla, and their

children Emily Mercado Mata and Eleazar Mercado Mata (collectively,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioners), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of their appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.