Eldon Samuel, III v. Terema Carlin
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202523-35408California1,194 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ELDON GALE SAMUEL III, No. 23-35408
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00545-REP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TEREMA CARLIN,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr., Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 3, 2025** Portland, Oregon
Before: BEA, KOH, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Eldon Gale Samuel, III (“Samuel”) appeals the district court’s denial of his
habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We review de novo a district court’s decision to deny
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). habeas relief. Ochoa v. Davis, 50 F.4th 865, 876 (9th Cir. 2022). We affirm.