Eldon Samuel, III v. Terema Carlin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202523-35408California1,194 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELDON GALE SAMUEL III, No. 23-35408

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00545-REP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TEREMA CARLIN,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr., Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 3, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, KOH, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Eldon Gale Samuel, III (“Samuel”) appeals the district court’s denial of his

habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. We review de novo a district court’s decision to deny

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). habeas relief. Ochoa v. Davis, 50 F.4th 865, 876 (9th Cir. 2022). We affirm.

Because this petition is subject to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.