Charles Chad Giese v. Craig Koenig

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES CHAD GIESE, Case No. 2:21-cv-08535-MEMF (JPR)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

CRAIG KOENIG, Warden,

JUDGE

Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommends denial of the Petition and dismissal of this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 43.) As explained below, Petitioner’s objections to the Report (ECF No. 48) do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. For his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, Petitioner objects to the Report’s finding that the “claims fail because [Petitioner] did not submit a 28 …