Warden

Mario Alberto Ojeda v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20252:23-cv-10927California1,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO ALBERTO OJEDA, Case No. 2:23-cv-10927-MCS-JC

12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

Respondent.

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions in connection with Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”), along with all of the records herein, including the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”), the documents lodged in support of the Motion (“Lodged Doc(s).”), the November 29, 2024 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation” or “R&R”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.