Iconic Mars Corporation v. Kaotica Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20253:22-cv-00092California6,216 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ICONIC MARS CORP., Case No.: 22-CV-0092-CAB-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON EQUITABLE CLAIMS

v. AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’

FEES AND COSTS

KAOTICA CORP.,

Defendant. [Doc. Nos. 123, 125 and 119] 16 Before the Court are the parties’ post-jury trial motions for resolution of equitable claims asserted in this litigation, and Kaotica Corporation’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. [Doc. Nos. 123, 125 and 119.] Iconic Mars Corporation (“Iconic”) seeks a finding of unfair competition against Kaotica. Kaotica Corporation seeks an award of disgorgement of Iconic’s profits for trade dress infringement, enhancement of the jury award of damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and a permanent injunction. The Court heard argument on the motions on January 16, 2025. [Doc. No. 142; Doc. No. 144, Hr’g Transcript.] A. Background As set forth in the pretrial order,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.