Justino Rupard v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20253:23-cv-01357California8,940 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 23CV1357 CAB (BLM) JUSTINO RUPARD, an individual;

RONNIE RUPARD, an individual, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’SS Plaintiff, MOTION TO COMPEL AND ISSUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY v. MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT

BE IMPOSED

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 14 Defendants. [ECF No. 158] 15 16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Justino Rupard’s December 6, 2024 Motion to Compel Defendant County of San Diego to Produce Critical Incident Review Board (“CIRB”) Documents (“MTC”). ECF No. 158. On December 13, 2024, Defendant County of San Diego (“County”) filed an Opposition (“Oppo.”). ECF No. 161. Plaintiff filed a Reply on December 20, 2024. ECF No. 163. Subsequently, the Court ordered Defendants to lodge the documents that are being withheld for an in camera review, along with proposed redactions. ECF No. 167. After reviewing Plaintiff’s MTC, County’s Oppo, Plaintiff’s Reply, and all supporting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.