Najafianashrafi

Najafianashrafi v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20251:24-cv-00336California899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZABIHOLLAH NAJAFIANASHRAFI, Case No. 1:24-cv-00336-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COSTS

AND MOTION FOR COSTS

v.

ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF

MERRICK GARLAND, et al., VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Defendants. (Docs. 26, 27, 28)

17 On November 20, 2024, this case was reassigned for all purposes to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Doc. 22.) On November 21, 2024, the Court granted Defendants’ ex parte application for an extension of time, extending the deadline for Defendants’ response to the complaint to February 3, 2025, and resetting the initial scheduling conference for March 6, 2025. (Doc. 23.) On February 3, 2025, Plaintiff Zabihollah Najafianashrafi, proceeding pro se, filed a Motion for Costs and supporting affidavit; Motion to Seal or Restrict Public Access to Case Records; and a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Docs. 25-28.) In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.