Doe
Doe v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JANE DOE, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00217-JLS-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER RESOLVING JOINT
MOTION FOR RESOLUTION OF
14 v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE REGARDING PROTECTIVE
WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, ORDER
INC., et al., Defendants. [ECF No. 151]
20 21 22
25 26 27 28 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Resolution of Discovery Dispute Regarding Protective Order. ECF No. 151. After conferring extensively about the protective order and resolving a number of issues, the parties disagree about the contents of four provisions. The Court resolves these disagreements as set forth below. I. LEGAL STANDARD The Court is vested with “broad discretion” to permit or deny discovery. Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002). See also Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 598 (1998) (“Rule 26 vests the trial judge with…