Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20255:22-cv-04844California3,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

CONSIDER WHETHER

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., DEFENDANTS' MATERIALS SHOULD

BE SEALED

Defendants. [Re: ECF 341]

13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s (“Plaintiff” or “Laatz”) Administrative Motion 14 to Consider Whether Defendants’ Materials Should be Sealed. ECF No. 341. Defendants filed a 15 statement in support of sealing the materials identified in Laatz’s motion. ECF No. 343. Plaintiff 16 submitted a response opposing Defendants’ statement in support of sealing. ECF No. 344. 17 For the reasons described below, Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether 18 Defendants’ Materials Should be Sealed is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

20 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.