Mattingly
Mattingly v. Jurek
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL JOSEPH MATTINGLY, Case No. 24-cv-04595-SVK
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN
v. PART AND DENYING IN
PART MOTION TO DISMISS
JAQUELINE JUREK, et al., WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AND
DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE
Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 15 12 Self-represented Plaintiff accuses three police officers with the California Department of 13 Parks and Recreation (the “Department”) of arresting him without a valid warrant in violation of 14 his rights under the United States and California constitutions. See Dkt. 1 (the “Complaint”). He 15 commenced this action to recover against the officers (Jaqueline Jurek, Tyler Knapp and Trevor 16 Morgan), two supervising police captains (Gabe McKenna and Joe Walters) and the director of the 17 Department (Armondo Quintero). Defendants now move to dismiss, and Plaintiff moves to strike 18 that dismissal request. See Dkts. 11 (the “MTD”), 13, 15 (the “MTS”), 21, 22, 27. All necessary 19 Parties—Plaintiff and named Defendants—have consented to…