Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20255:22-cv-04844California2,129 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL AND TO CONSIDER

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S

MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED

Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 337] 12 Before the Court are Defendants Zazzle Inc. (“Zazzle”) and Mohamed Alkhatib’s 13 (collectively, “Defendants”) Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and To Consider Whether 14 Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed, filed in connection with their Motion for Summary 15 Judgment (Dkt. No. 338). ECF 337. Plaintiff Nicky Laatz (“Plaintiff”) filed sealing statement 16 opposing Defendants’ administrative motion. ECF 339. For the reasons stated below, the Court 17 GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

19 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.